Insects and Imagined Wars

Deogratius Wilfred Kadete
0
Insects and Imagined Wars — imagindi
imagindi — field study no. 001

Insects and Imagined Wars

a specimen reading, in three cases

The bee finds value in the sweet,

The fly in decay and heat.

The termite claims the dry, dead grain,

The ant drinks life from sap and rain.

My treasure dwells in mind and space,

Yet I smell decay in a fragrant place.

What my imagination fails to see:

A termite fight an ant, a fly a bee.

Yet instinct needs no mind or cause:

When nature calls, the ant starts wars.

Case I — four territories, no claim disputed
Bee
the sweet
Fly
decay & heat
Termite
dry grain
Ant
sap & rain

Four collectors, four resources, no overlap in the ledger. Nothing here to contest.

Case II — wars never filed
Termite vs. Ant
not found in nature
Fly vs. Bee
not found in nature

The only place these specific matchups exist is in the mind that went looking for them — that doesn't mean nature stays quiet.

Case III — two kinds of war
Instinct's war
cause: none required
real — when nature calls
Imagination's war
cause: invented grievance
manufactured — avoidable

The final couplet is a correction, not a contradiction: nature is not peaceable by virtue, only by economy — it fights when survival demands it, and needs no idea to do so. Only the mind at the top of this page needs one.

Curator's notes

Reading the plate

01 — Everyone already knows their job

The first four lines describe a world where nobody has to think twice. The bee wants sweetness. The fly wants rot. The termite wants dry wood. The ant wants sap. Each one just goes and gets it — no debate, no second-guessing. Nature already sorted out who gets what.

02 — The cost of having a mind

Then the poem turns to a human speaker, and things get more complicated. Our "treasure" isn't a physical thing like nectar or sap — it lives in our head, in ideas. That gives us a strange extra power: we can look at something that seems perfectly nice and still sense something's off. A bee just takes the nectar and moves on. A person can walk into a lovely room and feel like something's wrong anyway. Imagination hands us that extra sense — and the extra worry that comes with it.

03 — Nothing to fight over

Next the poem notices something nice: none of these bugs fight each other. The fly doesn't want what the bee wants, so there's nothing to argue about. Same with the termite and the ant. When nobody's chasing the same thing, nobody has a reason to go to war. It's that simple.

04 — But instinct can still go to war

The poem doesn't let nature off the hook, though. The last two lines turn things around: "Yet instinct needs no mind or cause: / When nature calls, the ant starts wars." Instinct doesn't need a reason to fight — when survival is on the line, a colony can go to war without any idea, grudge, or grievance behind it.

So nature isn't peaceful because it's noble. It's peaceful because, most of the time, nobody's in anybody's way. The moment that changes, war doesn't need permission from anyone.

05 — The real point

We usually picture insects as the ones fighting over scraps. This poem flips that: the bugs stay calm until survival actually forces their hand. Humans are the opposite — we can invent a reason to fight even when nothing real is being contested. The poem's last quiet joke is that the only "imagined war" worth worrying about is the one we start ourselves, over nothing at all.

Further reading — The Brain We Have, Not the Brain We Imagine

imagindi · field study no. 001 · insects and imagined wars
Tags:

Post a Comment

0 Comments

Thank you for reading!

Post a Comment (0)

Translate

3/related/default